The Other Shoe

928hdr

Others Receiving Votes: Toledo (68), Oregon (64)

It was following a game against Utah in 2009 that the Ducks last found themselves voted off the AP Top 25 island, so it is only fitting that a game against Utah, mark their first return outside of it in six years.

The 98 weeks in-between provided a glorious run of historical proportions for the Ducks: Their first Rose Bowl appearance in 15 years, two Rose Bowl wins, the first of which ending a 95-year drought, which is to say nothing of the two National Championship appearances, four PAC-10/12 titles, four Top-4 finishes, and the first No. 1 ranking in school history that were all celebrated during that time. It was an unprecedented time for a program long bereft of success.

That magical run came to a screeching halt with the 62 points scored by Utah, the most allowed by Oregon at home in school history. In fact, it was their worst home loss in nearly 40 years, and their worst overall loss in the past 12. When the end happened, it happened fast, it happened hard, and the era was finished.

The Utah Utes defeat Oregon Ducks in a lopsided rare loss at Autzen Stadium 62-20.

Craig Strobeck

Optimism is not dead for the Ducks.

The other shoe on a great run has finally fallen, but that doesn’t mean the sky has. There is no reason to assume the Ducks are destined for mediocrity. The team is too talented, too well supported, and too well-positioned for this to be permanent.

Rather, this slide is simply a circumstance that happens to all great programs: There are seasons of regression, especially with young teams, and especially after trying to replace a Heisman Trophy winner, which is exactly what the Ducks are currently experiencing.

It had previously been assumed that Oregon’s 2013 season was the rock-bottom of their status as an elite program in college football, a regression the Ducks rescued themselves from by returning to their “rightful” place last season. The assumption was that Oregon is plug-and-play, reload not rebuild, next man up and so on.

But in reality, teams have good seasons, bad seasons and various in-between seasons. What makes a program “good,” is its consistent ability to have a high frequency of winning seasons, but no program is immune to years of regression, even if only temporary. Ten-win seasons in perpetuity are not sustainable for any program.

Many national champions have had drop-offs in the years after their titles: LSU went 8-5 in 2008, Florida went 9-4 the year between its two most recent titles, and that’s to say nothing of title runners-up that finished with eight wins or fewer, such as Nebraska, Oklahoma and of course Texas, which failed to make a bowl game in 2010 after its title game run the year before.

The sun sets in Saturday's game.

Craig Strobeck

The sun sets in Saturday’s game.

We tend to think of national champions in terms of their dynastic runs and year-after-year success, but even those dynasties can end in coaching changes. Pete Carroll and Nick Saban left the programs they coached to titles, for opportunities in the NFL.

Urban Meyer left Florida when he “retired,” just two years after their last championship, and the on-field product dwindled so quickly at Auburn after its championship in 2010 — with seasons of 8-5 and 3-9 the next two years — that it promptly fired head coach Gene Chizik faster than any championship-winning coach in modern history. Of course, the very next year they returned to the title game with a new coach.

That is the lesson for college football teams; all programs that experience success, will also experience transition and regression. Oregon is not alone in regressing from the elite, and its track record of success is more recent than other programs’,  which provides us with little long-term historical evidence to assure fans that they will rebound.

But during the past two decades, the Ducks have gone through multiple transitional periods — and they came out stronger each time. Just like the not-quite ghosts of Oregon’s past, this team will find its way out.

So this should be seen as a milestone; an opportunity for the coaching staff to define itself under its own terms. Improved fundamentals will be essential for the Ducks to succeed, and if they do succeed, it won’t be because of Marcus Mariota’s arm or Chip Kelly’s system. It will be because of the work that this staff, alone, puts in.

Things looked very different for Oregon in 2003.

John Giustina

Things looked very different for Oregon in 2003.

Don’t forget what happened 12 years ago — 2003 was a rough year for Oregon football. The Ducks had lost nine of the last 14 games, their pro-style offense just was not cutting it. But between a 55-16 loss to Washington State, and a particularly nasty 59-14 Arizona State loss, sat a loss to Utah that changed the face of Oregon football forever.

Head coach Mike Bellotti saw the utility of the Utes’ spread offense, but was unable to persuade his offensive coaching staff to implement it. It took the 2004 season — Oregon’s only losing campaign since 1993 — for Bellotti to pull the plug on that old-fashioned, pro-style relic, and switch to a system which paved the way for Oregon’s success over the past decade.

The Ducks are at the end of an era, but that does not mean they are at the end of their success. Just like 10 years ago, their rivals have caught up, and now the Ducks have to fall back on their trademark tradition: Innovation.

How they choose to respond and how they evolve will determine the future of the Quack Attack for generations. We fans are lucky enough to witness this changing of the guard, as the true beginning of the Mark Helfrich era.

Whether or not our Ducks will rise to heights never before risen, or soar in skies touched only by outstretched fingers of imagination, can only be answered in time. But until then – GO DUCKS!

Top photo by Craig Strobeck.

Print Friendly

 Volunteer Position Openings:

--Media Management/Supervisor:  We are looking for someone beyond college age who can help manage students and mentor in a number of different departments. Expertise is not required as organizational skills and interest in guiding others.   --Assistant Football Analyst: Love college football and enjoy watching it for hours? We need associates to view games and find the techniques/teaching points we identify for them in advance.  You will be recognized in publications, and could have the opportunity to move to full Analyst.   --College Football Analyst: We are looking for Coaches, or retired coaches to help create analysis videos (we do the video part) that will be viewed by thousands, and will help young football players as well as fans understand the game much better. The national recognition will help your resume' as well as make an impact upon the game we all dearly love.   --Video Specialist: We are looking for help in the Eugene/Springfield area to assist with the shooting and editing of analysis videos.   All Positions: Send a resume' with full contact information and any writing samples you have to charles@fishduck.com  Again, these are volunteer positions donating five hours a week each.

Nathan Roholt

Nathan Roholt

Nathan Roholt is a senior writer and managing editor emeritus for FishDuck. Follow him on Twitter @nathanroholt. Send questions/feedback/hatemail to nroholtfd@gmail.com.

  • John John

    or turn back into the lovable losers that characterized the program for the vast majority of the decades of its history. Did the clock strike twelve and the ducks football team turn back into the proverbial pumpkin?? has the descent trajectory tide come in? Clearly the defensive system and coordinator is in extreme doubt. The coaching staff led by helfrich has been absolutely clueless as to what needs to be done. They were shaky in the two games against the subdivision 2 schools. But Helfrich has looked like the proverbial deer in the headlights. Does Helfrich really have any idea of what to do as a head coach to fix the problems? Is the recruiting of the post-kelly era saying something?? quaterback??? Is helfrich a good head coach? or is he better suited to just being an offensive coordinator? these are some of the real questions at this point.

  • Dennis Bolt

    Great story Nathan. But the lede stat about the Ducks getting dumped from top 25 in 2009 “following” the Utah game is confusing (maybe you meant “soon” after the 2009 Utah game?) Or were you actually trying to bookend with the 2003 Utah loss, as you mention in end of story? …….According to the Wikipedia article of that season, UO beat Utah in 2009 and it was actually after the infamous Boise punch game that was when the Ducks got booted from poll, not to remerge after retro beatdown of #6 Cal. Go Ducks!