Quantcast

The Validation of ‘We’: How Fans Are Verifiably Part of the Game

The Validation of ‘We’: How Fans Are Verifiably Part of the Game

FishDuck Staff
Reported by FishDuck Staff on June 26, 2012
In ,
| 0 Comments

Did you know that football season begins this week?
No, there are no official practices, no games yet on the horizon, with kickoff still 67 days away. Nonetheless, incoming freshman will arrive and begin summer classes and voluntary workouts. The initial preparations for the 2012 season are upon us, and once again the excitement begins to build.

Imagine for a moment, arriving at the Autzen Complex on September 1st. There will be grills barbecuing all your favorite foods. Duck fans gathered to talk football, celebrating with each other the joys of the new season. They will reminisce about last year, and dream of the possibilities of the upcoming season. Football has indeed started anew. Feels good, doesn’t it?

67 days and counting until this becomes a reality

What is it, though, that draws fans of every major conference, and even the “non-BCS” conferences to gather by the thousands and derive so much pleasure in the competition of others? Why is it that these loyalties to particular collegiate institutions run so deep? Deep enough, in fact, that rivalries are indeed very real, sometimes turning random strangers into bitter enemies; case in point this Red River Rivalry incident that makes every male wince.

There are many theories for this, and I am not the first to have this discussion. The first, and most obvious is the concept of tribalism. We are often attracted to a team based on different extraneous factors. In professional sports, it is almost entirely about proximity to the team. With college sports, it is a number of different things. Either we were “raised” as a fan; went to the school; or adopted it as a favorite through other friendships. Human beings, by nature, tend to feel the need to belong to a larger group. There is safety in a group, and danger in alone-ness. Well, in tribal times, this was the case.

As civilization evolved, the tribal nature of our existence diminished, but our need to feel like we belonged to something bigger than ourselves did not vanish. As society has become increasingly less personally interactive through devices such as phones, automobiles, planes, cell phones and now internet technology which has made communicating without contact prevalent, fan-ship seems to have grown and become even more intense.

In Jerry Seinfeld's perception: you didn't win, you watched.

Jerry Seinfeld once quipped, “People come back from the game yelling, “‘We won! We won!’ No–they won; you watched.”

This is true of just about everyone I know. We try, sometimes with all of our effort, to convince ourselves that it is “just a game,” but it’s not. It is more than a game; it is an experience. It is an identity, one that draws people together, almost into regional clans.

But there has to be more to it than that. After all, there are plenty of other activities that could draw our attention, so why sports?

There are many other schools of thought. The most interesting to me, though, is from Hans Ulrich Gumbrecht, Professor of Literature at Stanford University. In his book In Praise of Athletic Beauty, (2006, Harvard University Press), Gumbrecht proposes a different attraction. Aesthetic Beauty.

Every fan cares about “their team” winning, and Gumbrecht does not disagree with this assertion. Nonetheless, he believes that even within the most diehard fans there exists a certain amount of appreciation for the beauty of the game. Gumbrecht argues that beauty is the least mentioned of the important reasons why people love sports, and that is why it is interesting to discuss.

While most every fan enjoys the thrill of victory, there is a certain amount of truth to Gumbrecht’s theory. Think about it for just a moment…Deep down, fans of every sport derive pleasure not just from winning, but from some element of the sport much more profound.

Think to an oblong football, released from the quarterback’s hand, spiraling through the crisp night air at Autzen Stadium. The ball seems to hang in space defying gravity, as a Duck receiver streaks down the field arriving at the exact moment the ball descends from the night sky into his waiting hands. The experience itself of watching all of these unique elements combined is a thing of beauty.

A brutal game can be beautiful too

Think for a moment, have you ever watched an opposing player make a play and said to yourself “Wow, what an incredible play?” Most of us have; that is the aesthetic beauty of which Gumbrecht speaks.

I tend to believe there is a multi-factoral combination of different aspects that draw us to sports. There is the tribalism, the social connection, the aesthetic beauty and the feeling of a tangible goal at the end: victory.  In this respect perhaps Jerry Seinfeld was wrong, it may be the coaches and players physically participating as fans observe, but emotionally fans remain every bit as invested as the players do, sharing in the revelry of victory or despairing in the bitterness of defeat. For that reason, saying ‘we won’ is very apt.

As we contemplate another season at Autzen Stadium, let us enjoy all the little things that make football the great game that it is. Though a physically tough sport, it is also one that is a beautiful combination of strength, speed and athleticism. Enjoy the company around you; that is what makes human kind so unique. And, most of all, enjoy each moment for what it is: a beautiful distraction.

 

Scott Reed is a Staff Analyst for Duck Sports Authority, to read more of his writing please visit DuckSportsAuthority.com and become a member!


 

 

This article is published and edited by:

Editor

FishDuck Staff

Editor In Chief

Dano Dunn

Dano Dunn