NFL’s Defense of Terrell Suggs a Problem for the Game

Jimmy Friedricks FishWrap, FishWrap Archive

In week 2 of the NFL preseason, Sam Bradford made his first start for the Philadelphia Eagles after recovering from a second ACL tear that sidelined him for most of last season. He was impressive, completing 3-of-5 passes and leading the Eagles to a touchdown in his only drive of the game. But what stuck out to me was Terrell Suggs’ incredibly dirty hit on Bradford during the fifth play of the game, and the response from the NFL shortly afterward.

During the play, Bradford handed the ball off to a running back only to be hit by Terrell Suggs at his knees. While it can be debated about whether this was a zone read run play, the fact is that Bradford was a defenseless player who clearly did not have the football. Yet he was hit at the knees.

Suggs was initially  assessed a 15-yard penalty on the play, but days after the game the NFL’s Vice President of Officiating, Dean Blandino, claimed the hit should have been legal. Blandino claimed Bradford was carrying out a read option play and was a potential runner, and thus the hit was legal.

Sam Bradford takes a hit in the knees from Terrell Suggs during week 2 of the NFL Preseason

Sam Bradford takes a hit in the knees from Terrell Suggs.

What the NFL ignores, however, is that Suggs did not even look at the running back, hand-off mesh point, or even the ball. He took several steps forward, and put his head down and dove into Sam Bradford’s knees.

It can be debated whether this was a read option play that would have allowed Suggs to legally hit Bradford. What is clear is that in a meaningless preseason game and after the ball was clearly handed off, Suggs deliberately tried to injure the opposing quarterback. His comments to the media after the game supported those ideas.

“When you run the read option, you’ve got to know the rules,” Suggs said. “If you want to run the read option with your starting quarterback that’s had two knee surgeries, that’s on you. That’s not my responsibility to update you on the rules, you see what I’m saying? I could have hit him harder than that. I didn’t. I eased up.”

If the NFL is going to allow these kinds of hits, the Eagles are going to need Tebow at some point.

If the NFL is going to allow these kinds of hits, the Eagles are going to need Tim Tebow at some point.

After several years of fighting off bad press regarding research about the effect of concussions, the health issues former players face, and a bounty scandal regarding one of the league’s premier teams, it is shocking to hear the NFL support Suggs’ action and try to justify it. This sets a terrible example for both NFL defenders told to hit and hurt quarterbacks while defending zone read plays, and to young kids playing football at the game’s lower levels.

How can youth football coaches be expected to coach kids to play the game in a safe way if the NFL is going to pretend it is okay to dive at the knees of a defenseless player as long as he is running a zone read? How are coaches expected to teach kids to keep their heads up and tackle in the midsection if one of the league’s top defensive players dives headfirst at the knees of an exposed and unprotected player?

How are coaches expected to teach kids to not try to deliberately injure the opponent if the kids see such behavior at the professional level?

I love football. I love the way it can teach young men how to work hard, play as a team, and to persevere through obstacles. However, fans should not tolerate a professional league preaching safety at its lower levels while allowing one of its marquee players to try to deliberately injure another human being due to a silly technicality.

Its a good thing Chip Kelly has four quarterbacks on his roster. If this is how the NFL is going to encourage defenses to play against the zone read, Kelly might need every single one before the end of the season.

Top Photo From Video

New 2024 FishDuck Publishing Schedule….

During the off-season the publishing schedule will consist of articles on Mondays and Tuesdays. Do keep checking as new articles could be published during the week when a writer has something to say.

In mid-August of 2024, we will go back to the seven-days-a-week of articles during the football season as we did in the football season of 2023.

The Our Beloved Ducks Forum (OBD) is where we we discuss the article above and many more topics, as it is so much easier in a message board format over there.  At the free OBD forum we will be posting Oregon Sports article links, the daily Press Releases from the Athletic Department and the news coming out every day.

Our 33 rules at the free OBD Forum can be summarized to this: 1) be polite and respectful, 2) do not tell anyone what to think, feel or write, and 3) no reference of any kind to politics. Easy-peasy!

OBD Forum members….we got your back.  No Trolls Allowed!