Knowing When to Leave: The Stark Contrast in Finales for Aliotti and Mack

nambhdr

 

Knowing the right time to leave is a sign of a professional, and at the same time is never an easy task.  No one wants to walk away when they are up, hoping to sustain those highs as long as possible.  Conversely, no one wants to walk away when they are down, always assuming that their fortunes will reverse and they will ascend to the top once again.  Amongst those who have the hardest time knowing when to leave at the most opportune time have been coaches.

Tonight’s Alamo Bowl will be the final game for two prominent coaches involved – Oregon Defensive Coordinator Nick Aliotti and Texas Head Coach Mack Brown – although they are leaving their respective schools under very different circumstances.  While Aliotti’s departure was very sudden in the public eyes, and met with heavy hearts within the walls of the athletic department, Mack Brown’s exit was so Brown will undoubtedly be recalled more in the national memory of the two coaches.

Inevitability, it is solely a product of their circumstances: one was a coach who won a National Championship with the biggest football program in the country’s most football-crazed state, while the other was a coordinator at a west coast program.  Even as their careers end, most media outlets have painted Brown with the “Gipper” brush, devoting endless discussion to players winning his final game for him.  This is a great narrative, except for one problem: It’s not true.

“We played for us, not him.” – Case McCoy, on playing in possibly Mack Brown’s final season #HookEm

— Justin Wells (@justinwells2424) December 8, 2013

Those hardly sound like the words of a player for whom the coach’s exit has any bearing on his motivation to win.  Compare those to the words uttered by Oregon’s players upon news of Aliotti’s retirement:

In an article written by The Oregonian‘s Jason Quick, shortly after announcing his retirement, Aliotti sounded like a man with few regrets about his decision, though he did sound forlorn on the topic of having never been a head coach:

I won’t say there is regret, but it would have been nice to try that, and lead your own team, have your own guys,” he said.

It is unfortunate that Aliotti never had that chance, given the relationship his players have spoken about and the innovations he made as a coordinator in recent years.  His high-risk, high-reward style with multiple substitution sets, that may prove to be ahead of his time should the current brand of up-tempo football remain popular.  Yet Aliotti has insight into possibly why he never became a head coach:

I like the X’s and O’s, and I like being with the kids, and I like rolling up my sleeves, and I like the coaching,” Aliotti said. “I’m not a politician … I’m not a schmoozer … I’m not a brownnoser.  I am who I am; I say what I feel and sometimes people don’t like it.

Aliotti’s choice of the word “politician” is fascinating, since that is the word that has been used to best describe the man leading the team he is tasked with stopping tonight, Mack Brown.  (Sports Illustrated‘s Andy Staples called him, “perhaps the best politician to ever coach a football game.”)  Brown’s politicking was always evident, never more so than when he convinced the BCS into letting Texas into the 2005 Rose Bowl.  His skills as a politician made him a highly effective recruiter, allowing him to rebuild a Texas program, and landing stars, most notably Vince Young, that helped him win games and titles that helped restore Texas football to national prominence.

Mack Brown has had many trying moments in recent seasons.

screen grab via 30fps.mocksession.com

Mack Brown has had many trying moments in recent seasons.

 

But for all the success he has enjoyed as the commander of talented athletes, Brown’s skills as an X’s and O’s coach was suspect.  He has no coaching fruit of significance, astoundingly, given the visibility of his program and the length of his tenure there.  His most notable former assistants who became head coaches are Gene Chizik and Will Muschamp, two coaches best known for appearing comically overmatched for the high-profile jobs they held.  Compare Brown’s coaching fruit to that of his long-time conference rival, former Texas Tech and current Washington State head coach Mike Leach, whose 2000 team had six current FBS head coaches (including Art Briles, Sonny Dykes, Dana Holgorsen, Ruffin McNeill, and starting quarterback Kliff Kingsbury) – nearly 5% of all the top jobs in college football, were a part of Leach’s team that season.

Still, Brown’s Longhorns won four more conference games than Leach’s team did on the strength of the talent Brown recruited.  That success was sustained for as long as he and his staff hit on recruiting, but once star talent was incorrectly evaluated, Brown demonstrated a lack of ability to encourage any improvements.   He had previously convinced everyone that Texas was an elite program, but those kind of programs don’t lose four-plus games per year for four straight seasons.  Like all politicians, his favorability with those he made promises to could only last as long as he delivered on them.

Nick Aliotti before the Colorado game in October.

Cliff Grassmick

Nick Aliotti before the Colorado game in October.

 

In that regard, maybe it’s best that Nick Aliotti was never a head coach.  He never had to deal with the ugly farewell that plagues nearly all great coaches.  Instead, he gets to leave being loved by both his fellow coaches and players; players that love him enough to express their sadness publicly, as they see him go.  For Mack Brown, his players couldn’t care less; best symbolized by his own starting quarterback publicly vocalizing that very sentiment in a very casual manner.  There are plenty of reasons for players to find motivation to win, and the reasons are vast for why many of them will play their hearts out tonight regardless of their coach’s future.  But if the argument is to be made about a team winning a last game for its coach, the smart pick will be on the team that will actually be sad to see him go.

Top photo from screengrabs of video provided by KEZI and the Texas Longhorns.

Print Friendly
Powered by
Announcements
  • The best Damn Opponent analysis on the web is coming out on Thursdays. Rory Davidson is a rising star at FishDuck.com as an analyst and you will always learn something new from him every week. Kim Hastings is our legendary humor writer who will be lampooning our opponent each week on Thursdays as well. So we will honor our opponent with Rory's respectful analysis...and then Kim will punch with glee and the opposing fans will have laugh at themselves. (or get indignant) What fun! Learning football and hooting at the opposition on Thursdays!
  • Want to help mentor and teach students at FishDuck.com? Be an ADVISOR to a department! We want people who are a little older to counsel associates and keep them on track. Knowledge of a dept. is not necessary and if you were in Eugene? All the better although other locations can work. If you can spare 3-5 hours a week, and enjoy working with students and like keeping things organized…then contact me charles@fishduck.com
  • Get experience in Media Management? Be a Managing Editor at FishDuck.com! If you can spare an hour a day to help the site stay on track, then you will be making decisions and learning skills that can help in Website or Newsroom management. A six month commitment required due to the training period, but it can help your resume as one who helping to manage over 40 writers and editors! Contact me charles@fishduck.com

Nathan Roholt

Nathan Roholt

Nathan Roholt is the Managing Editor for Fishduck.com. He is a 2005 graduate of the University of Oregon in Business Administration, a degree he used to obtain a series of unremarkable corporate jobs prior to his current position. He currently lives with his wife in Portland, OR. Follow him on twitter @nroholtfd and email him any questions or feedback at nroholtfd@gmail.com.

  • hokieduck

    Good read, Nathan.

    • hokieduck

      Although I suspect that McCoy’s comments were taken out of context and do not exemplify the callousness that they appear to.