In college football, the modern era is generally considered to have begun after World War II ended. But it was actually in 1994 that the game solidified around the NCAA’s 85-scholarship limit. Isn’t a game only relevant so long as there is a reasonably level playing field? And as Oregon fans know, it is precisely that year, ’94, in which the program was transformed.
Coincidentally, the Ducks in this year’s Rose Bowl were playing a program whose rise models Oregon’s almost exactly. In the 1990s, the Ducks were tied with the Wisconsin Badgers for 27th most appearances in the Associated Press top 25 poll. In the 2000s, the two teams were tied again, at 13th. Both programs languished in the 1970s, achieved some modest success in the 1980s, and then began winning conference titles in the mid-1990s (1993 for Wisconsin, 1994 for Oregon).
There are other programs across the nation to rise when given the chance to succeed on an even playing field, such as Virginia Tech, Texas Tech, Utah and Boise State. Virginia Tech may be, along with Oregon, the ultimate poster child for the transformation from mediocre program to powerhouse. The Hokies had never been to a BCS bowl game before the 1994 switch to 85 scholarships. Since then, they’ve played in seven, including, like Oregon, a national championship game appearance.
Scholarship limits have affected each program differently since 1994. And it wasn’t as if there were no limits before then. From 1978-91, there was a 95-scholarship limit. This period exactly parallels Washington’s greatest era of prominence. The Huskies enjoyed a .76 winning percentage during these years, after hovering around .500 in the three decades before that.
Some top programs have continued to flourish no matter what the scholarship limits may be. Southern California has been a powerhouse almost continuously, and legendary programs like Alabama and Texas have also stayed near the top in times of both unlimited scholarships per team and parity-inducing 85-scholarship-limit years. But look at what it’s done to Notre Dame, for example. Their generations of glory end roughly in the mid-1990s with the departure of head coach Lou Holtz.
The Fighting Irish aren’t the only top-tier program to slide following the introduction of the 85-scholarship limit. UCLA from 1945-98 played in a whopping 15 January bowls, including 11 Rose Bowls. Since then, the team has played in none. Nebraska can claim all or a share of five national championships, and can claim an astonishing 33 appearances in BCS Bowls or the equally prestigious Cotton Bowl. But they have slid since the team’s last national title concluding the 1997 season. And even before Joe Paterno’s legacy was tarnished and the legendary coached fired due to the Jerry Sandusky scandal, the Nittany Lions peaked as a powerhouse after beating the Ducks in the 1995 Rose Bowl.
It’s not to say all the glories achieved by teams across the country are invalidated if they fell before 1994. Especially for a Duck fan to argue as such might be construed as convenient given how it parallels the rise of our team. And along with the 85-scholarship limit, it goes without saying that other factors, such as coaching, facilities, recruiting and fan support factor in just as importantly. Yet to look at the likes of Oregon and the group of teams like it that have upended years as outsiders to become college football’s new establishment, one sees a special breed of program that did something that poor old-money powers at USC and Alabama will never get to do: change the course of history and establish a winning tradition.
Brian Libby is a writer and photographer living in Portland. A life-long Ducks football fanatic who first visited Autzen Stadium at age eight, he is the author of two histories of UO football, “Tales From the Oregon Ducks Sideline” and “The University of Oregon Football Vault.” When not delving into all things Ducks, Brian works as a freelance journalist covering design, film and visual art for publications like The New York Times, Architect, and Dwell, among others.
Daily Articles NO MORE on FishDuck
Please see this explanation right here… and to learn about the impact of FishDuck on so many–check the summary right here. I will be writing intermittently on FishDuck (as the mood strikes) this summer, and a couple of times a week during the football season, and those articles and analyses will be posted here on FishDuck, and the links to my articles will also be available on the new site PuddleHuddle, when it is up soon.
New at FishDuck? Learn about the site right here!
Our 32 rules can be summarized to this: 1) be polite and respectful, 2) keep it clean, and 3) no reference of any kind to politics. Easy-peasy!
Take note though, there are NO STRIKES, NO WARNINGS, and NO SLACK given. Violate the rules and you are gone, as this is what the 99% who post superb comments want. (The Ban could be for weeks, months or permanent) For the less than 1% out there who do not have impulse-control … as you write your comment that violates our rules, ask yourself, “is this worth getting banned over?”
FishDuck members….we got your back. No Trolls Allowed!