College Football Is Around the Corner. Wanna Bet?

Jon Joseph Editorials 23 Comments

(From the movie Stripes.)

Cruiser: Maybe I should fold.

Ox: Let me see, Cruise. Let me look first. (Looks at Cruiser’s hand.) Fold? Not with a hand like that! Come on, dare me. Bluff me!

Cruiser: How much should I bet?

Ox: If it was me, I’d bet everything. But I’m Mr. Las Vegas. Come on, go for it. (Cruise puts all his money in the pot.) Yes, yes, there you go!

Cruise: What do you got?

Ox: Well, I got a full house, three 3s and two 6s. That’s what we call a full house.

Cruise: What have I got?

Ox: You have a 3, two 4s, an 8 and an ace. So, you lose. But if you had four 4s, you would have won! You’re getting really good at this game, Cruise.

Unless you find yourself in a state that allows sports betting, the following is for laughs only. But if you are in a state that allows sports betting, pay attention, and don’t get gored by the Ox  (aka “the house”). Remember, the odds are never in your favor. Most gaming institutions have their college football over/under lines posted for the 2019 season. Let’s take a look, and I’ll share what I would do, were I betting man.

Tom Corno

Betting on college sports is now legal in many states.

Fan Duel Sports Book, in New Jersey, was one of the first to post a 2019 CFB line. The following is Fan Duel’s over/under for the Pac-12 North, with comments provided by sports bettor and sharp Mike Josephs. (No relation to Yours Truly, by the way. In addition to the “s” in his last name, Josephs wins too much to be related to a “Cruiser-like” gambler such as myself.)

How do the lines work?  -115 means that you bet $1.15 to win a $1.  +115 means that you bet $1 to win $1.15. I note that, as a lead-in to his Pac-12 analysis, Josephs opines that, “The Pac-12 really needs USC to become relevant, and keeping Clay Helton as a coach may not get the Trojans there.” (In other news, the sun will rise in the east tomorrow.) Let’s take a look at the lines, shall we?

Pac-12 North

Cal: Six wins. Over -102, Under -114

Josephs sees five to six wins for the Golden Bears. My Verdict: no bet.

Oregon: 8.5 wins. Over -165, Under +140

Josephs sees 9 wins, but at -165 it’s not worth the bet. For those of you anxious about the 2019 season, if you think eight wins is the limit for the Ducks, +140 is a good value. My Verdict: no bet.

Oregon State: 2.5 wins. Over +130, Under -155

Josephs likes the under, but the price equals no bet. My Verdict: no bet.

Stanford: 6.5 wins. Over -108, Under -108

Josephs says to bet the over. If you are so inclined, pay attention to Stanford’s early schedule. The Cardinal opens with B1G West champ Northwestern, trips to USC and AAC champ UCF, and then plays Oregon in Palo Alto. Stanford closes with a home game against Notre Dame, to boot. My Verdict: bet the over at your own risk.

Kevin Cline

Stanford has a tough road in 2019.

Washington: 9.5 wins. Over +110, Under -130

Josephs says, with an easy out-of-conference slate, take the over. He thinks UW goes 10-2 and, depending on where the losses come, wins the North. For what it’s worth, I made a wager on the under. Will Jacob Eason come through at QB? Can UW reload its defensive backfield? And UW plays at Stanford, and although its matchup against Utah is a home game, drawing the presumptive Pac-12 South champ is no walk in the park. My Verdict: take the under.

Washington State:  8.5 wins Over +115, Under -135

Josephs thinks Wazzu might win nine games. He doesn’t like the odds on the under bet. I see the Cougs winning eight games but agree that the under is too pricey. My Verdict: no bet.

Other CFB media outlets, CBS, FOX and ESPN, also have over/under totals up. Below are a few of ESPN’s over/under projections for the 2019 season. Of course, ESPN has “no skin” in the game. If Lee Corso had to back up his helmet predictions with greenbacks, his bank account would be in trouble.

ESPN’s Over/Under Projections

Alabama: 11 wins. Over +100, Under -121

A buck to win a buck on Saint Nick Saban running the regular-season table? With four cupcakes, three at home Duke at a “neutral site” and LSU tripping to Tuscaloosa, I took the over. Plus, after the Clemson championship game beat-down, you can bet, as I so bet, that the Tide will be ready to roll.

I think Tua Tagovailoa, under the tutelage of new/old offensive coordinator Steve Sarkisian, will blow up many a scoreboard. He is the returning leader in Yards Per Play at QB. He produced 10+ yards last season every time he threw or ran the ball. Thank goodness Mark Helfrich delayed making an offer to this kid … That remains one of the all-time biggest recruiting gaffes. My Verdict: take the over and don’t look back.

From Twitter

The Tide will roll with Tua at the helm in 2019.

Clemson: 10.5 wins. Over -139, Under +115

I took the over here. It’s expensive at -139, but look at the Tigers’ talent and their schedule. The ACC is way down and Clemson gets A&M at home. My Verdict: take the over on the champs.

Georgia: 10 wins. Over -182 (!), Under +150

Why not simply post 10.5 wins? Only a dog-gone Dawg lover would take these odds on the over. My Verdict: stay the heck away from this bet.

 Oklahoma: 10 wins. Over -148, Under +120

Will grad transfer Jalen Hurts hear the siren sound of QB whisperer Lincoln Riley as did transfers and Heisman winners Baker Mayfield and Kyler Murray? Texas lost tons of guys on both sides of the ball. Like Clemson, this is another school playing in a mediocre-at-best conference. But, -148 is too beau coup. The Sooners’ big out-of-conference game in 2019? The Chippers in LA. My Verdict: tempting, but too expensive. No bet.

Ohio State: 10 wins. Over +100, Under -121

Easy out-of-conference slate. With a new HC and a new, untested QB, I see a push (10 wins) for Ohio State. My Verdict: push.

From Twitter

Ohio State’s new starting quarterback, Justin Fields

 UW: 10 wins Over +137, Under -167

I could find no “real odds” this favorable. The under here is crazy expensive. UW is another school with a joke of an out-of-conference schedule. But lots of guys are gone on both sides of the ball, and in his one year as a starting QB at Georgia, Eason barely completed 50% of his throws. ESPN is far higher on UW than I am. I see at least three defeats, with an Oregon victory in Seattle being one of them.

Coach Chris Petersen has taken advantage of a down Pac-12, but so far, he has zero impressive out-of-conference wins with the Huskies. Personally, I think his sterling coaching rep is based on cheap Group of 5 wins at Boise St. and not much else. My Verdict: the under is pricey, but the smart move.

Washington State: 10 wins. Over -110, Under -110

I could find no book that has WSU with 10 wins. If I had, I would have bet the under with a bullet. Unless “The Pirate” (aka Mike Leach) has been able to beard another mustache, there’s no way the Cougs reach this lofty number. A loss to WSU in Autzen this season would be a huge downer for the Ducks. My Verdict: take the under with no hesitation.

Oregon: 8.5 wins. Over +120, Under -148

Compare this with the above Fan Duel line of -165 over and +140 under. Fan Duel’s line, compared to ESPN’s, would drive most gamblers to an under bet. On the other hand, with the over at -165, Fan Duel believes that most will wager on the Ducks coming in at 9 or more wins. My Verdict: still too dicey to warrant a bet.

Kevin Cline

Do you think the Ducks win more than eight games in 2019?

Utah: 8.5 wins. Over -150, Under +123

I think Utah easily covers the 8.5, but $1.50 to make a $1 is too much. Utah, at 8.5 wins, leads the Pac-12 South in projected wins. What does that say about the South? My Verdict: take the over, but only if you have deep pockets.

To recap, according to The World Wide Leader, the usual suspects, depending on where an L might pop up, are lined up for the Playoff. The Dog Biscuits win the Pac-12 North, and Utah wins the Pac-12 South. If That School Up North wins the conference championship game, we likely see a re-run of the 2018 Rose Bowl, according to the oddsmakers. Men of Oregon, do not let this travesty morph into reality!

One final piece of advice: be careful with your change. As George Bernard Shaw once said, “In gambling, the many [us suckers] must lose in order that the few [the House] may win.” And, as I have unfortunately spoken in the past, “Momma, tonight it’s Tube Steak and not T-bone …”

Jon Joseph
Georgetown, Texas                                                                                                                                                                         Top Photo by Kevin Cline

 

Andrew Mueller, the FishDuck.com Volunteer Editor for this article, works in digital marketing in Chicago, Illinois.

 

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

THREE FishDuck Promises to Readers…

We will be the cleanest Oregon site with no ads or videos starting up to annoy you.

We will be the easiest Oregon site for mobile (Cell phone and Pad) users, as we want it fast for you.

We will be the safest Oregon site for everyone, as we monitor comments and assure that everyone is polite to all. (And we do want all your opinions!)

Simple, clean, safe and fast!