My FishDuck Friends–this is the official Colorado GameDay Thread for discussion before, during and after the game. As before, addressing any negative in the game is fine, but let’s not be venting on other Oregon fans. Thanks.
Now let’s look at what happened at the end of the UCLA game with all the quotes in one place (below) and discuss what each of us thinks should be done in the “endgame.” Of course I have my commentary below the Mario Cristobal and Joe Moorhead quotes for us to chew on.
UCLA Endgame Strategy from Coaches Cristobal and Moorhead:
Question: The second interception that Anthony had there in the fourth quarter, what was the reasoning and decision behind throwing it on that down? Was that kind of going for the knockout blow because if you score there the game is over? I think you mentioned it might have been a non-quarterback issue. I was just wondering more of what went wrong on that play?
Cristobal: “Two things. No. 1, yeah we do want to be aggressive. We’d like to have that play call back. That’s just being honest. We analyzed it as a staff. That’s one where we wanted to score. We felt we were going to have to score. We wanted to get to four minute offense when it was four minutes. We did do that — closer to two minutes. We needed one more first down, but we felt that we could score and wanted to score. We’d like to have that play call back. The throw wasn’t what we wanted either. Not a good play, and not the call we wanted.”
Per Joe Moorhead, the offensive coordinator and play caller, Cristobal communicated the plan to remain aggressive. He told Moorhead to “call the game the way we had to get to that point”. Moorhead pointed to a recent game between Louisville and Virginia for why keeping the foot on the gas pedal felt correct in that moment. In that game Louisville settled for a field goal to go up six before Virginia drove for the game-winning touchdown.
“In my mind a field goal puts you up six, so a touchdown still wins the game, so you’re looking at that situation,” Moorhead said of the circumstances in the 34-31 score game. “The thought process was let’s score a touchdown and put this one out of reach, and not have to settle for a field goal and run the risk of losing on a touchdown.”
Like Cristobal, Moorhead isn’t under the impression that the execution was good. Brown’s throw was off, and Moorhead said his preference would’ve been to have that ball thrown through the end zone. However, he took responsibility for the call that was made that set up the interception. “I’m a guy who wants to point a thumb and not a finger, and if there was a better play to be called there to try to take a shot in the end zone, then I wish I could’ve called a better one there,” he stated. “It’s a results-oriented game, and we didn’t execute. I need to find a better way be more successful in that situation where we’re trying to win the game.” From 247 10/25/2021 Erik Skopil
The Our Beloved Ducks Forum is BACK! Come get the links to Oregon Sports articles, the press releases from the Oregon Athletic Department and the news from your fellow Duck fans. It is the only safe place on the web for Duck Discussion, such as today’s article, so join us over there!
FishDuck Endgame Ponderings and Philosophy
I am really surprised at the approach taken by our coaches in that situation. The problem is how they approached it from a score perspective instead of a time perspective. The FishDuck Philosophy for the “endgame” is summarized in a motto I created years ago…
“At the end of the game, first downs are as important as touchdowns earlier in the game because without both–you don’t win. Thus you must make those first downs by any means possible, and that may include passing.”
Coach Chuck Smith (smith72) and I were discussing this recently in how the Chargers finished out two games recently. Their coach believed in the importance of burning clock via the first downs (not scoring!), and actually had Justin Herbert throw two tough-clutch passes for key first downs against Las Vegas. The next week had a similar scenario with the Cleveland Browns, who then had their defense aligned to stop the pass. The Chargers then ran a Counter running play to get a surprising nine yards, the first down and the game. By any means possible!
A legendary coach who has written on this site before explained how his opponents knew that if his team had or grabbed the lead in the fourth quarter, the opponent would never see the ball again. Coach Tony DeMeo‘s teams almost never lost in the fourth quarter once they had the lead.
Coach DeMeo believes in having an offense for the “Endgame” that gets first downs and burns clock, and that includes passing. His objective is quite simple: he will burn clock until the game is over and as long as he has the lead — the score no longer matters, as the opposing team will not get back on offense.
Best Example EVER at Oregon? Cal in 2010…
The Ducks had the slim 17-15 lead and started a drive on their own 20 yard line with 9:25 remaining in the game. Did Chip do three Pistol-Plunges or try to score when it was tough-sledding that night? No. He began one of the most epic clock-burning drives in Oregon history, as the coach known for scoring quickly went on a drive that burned the entire 9:25 and ended with taking a knee on the Cal 13 yard line to run out the clock.
That is what our 2021 Ducks should have done in the Rose Bowl.
The interception was thrown when the Ducks were on the UCLA 24 yard line with 3:07 left, and 2nd and 9; the replay shows that no receivers were open (I have no idea what Johnny Johnson III was doing), and Anthony Brown could have side-stepped the rush, tucked it and run for six or seven yards and it would be 3rd down and short.
Get this first down and one more first down, and take a knee inside the ten yard to finish the game. I am quite sure Coach Moorhead has some plays in his back pocket that could have been used to make two more first downs.
By any means possible for the first downs!
I am curious as to your thoughts, since we will probably run into this “endgame” dilemma again during the Cristobal era, won’t we?
“Oh, how we love to ponder about Our Beloved Ducks!”
Charles Fischer (Mr. FishDuck)
Top Photo by Jerry Thompson
Come join us in the new Our Beloved Ducks Forum, where you get the news about Oregon Sports and is the safest place on the web to read and post your opinions!
Charles Fischer has been an intense fan of the Ducks, a season ticket holder at Autzen Stadium for 35 years and has written reports on football boards for over 23 years. Known as “FishDuck” on those boards, he is acknowledged for providing intense detail in his scrimmage reports and in his Xs and Os play analyses. He and his wife Lois, have a daughter Christine, reside in Eugene Oregon, where he was a Financial Advisor for 36 years and now focuses full-time on Charitable Planned Giving Workshops for churches and non-profit organizations.
He does not profess to be a coach or analyst, but simply a “hack” that enjoys sharing what he has learned and invites others to correct or add to this body of Oregon Football! See More…
FishDuck Going to Articles on Monday and Tuesday Only…
Our off-season schedule begins, and we move from publishing articles seven days a week to Mondays and Tuesdays only. Same great group of writers, and we will have an article on other days on occasion.
The Our Beloved Ducks Forum (OBD) is where we we discuss the article above and many more topics, as it is so much easier in a message board format over there. At the free OBD forum we will be posting Oregon Sports article links, the daily Press Releases from the Athletic Department and the news coming out every day.
Our 33 rules at the free OBD Forum can be summarized to this: 1) be polite and respectful, 2) do not tell anyone what to think, feel or write, and 3) no reference of any kind to politics. Easy-peasy!
OBD Forum members….we got your back. No Trolls Allowed!