Three years of college football playoffs have clarified the team selection criteria. The most heavily weighted variable, aside from won-loss record, seems to be strength of schedule.
The 2017 College Football Playoff committee looks favorably on those who challenge themselves out-of-conference even more than it values a conference championship. Recognizing that schools have no discretion in their league schedules, the only sure way to improve ones strength of schedule is to play tough out-of-conference Power Five opponents.
Nowhere was this more apparent than in 2014, when Oregon’s victory over highly ranked Michigan State offset an abysmal performance at Arizona.
This example, along with others not involving the Ducks, supports the premise that a good win counts more than a bad loss. Unless one expects to navigate its conference schedule unscathed, then it is incumbent on the athletic director to arrange at least one winnable out-of-conference game per season against a team that will likely be ranked after Thanksgiving.
My recent conversation with Deputy Athletic Director, Eric Roedl, convinced me that this is no easy task.
On Sept. 9, 2028 the Ducks will host Baylor. Although it may be premature to mark your calendar, let alone head for the ticket office, it is necessary to nail down desirable opponents before someone else scoops them up.
When Texas A&M opted out of its contract with UO for games in 2018 and 2019, it became impossible to find a comparable substitute. The Ducks recovered strength of schedule-wise in 2019 by agreeing to a neutral site game versus Auburn.
But the 2018 out-of-conference slate is a cupcake fest: Bowling Green, Portland State and San Jose State. Thus far, their combined 2017 record is a stay-home-and-mow-the-lawn 2-21. The point is to plan way ahead with the Power Five or get left out in the cold.
Of course, careful planning is no guarantee. No one knows how good Oregon or Baylor will be in 2018, let alone a decade later.
There is a mind-numbing array of factors to be considered when formulating out-of-conference schedules. For financial reasons, Oregon and most other Power Five teams, want seven home games per year. The standard (but not universal) formula for schools that play nine conference games is to face one Power Five opponent, one mid-major, and one FCS. The Power Five opponent will most assuredly expect a home and home series, while the other opponents typically will not.
Although, a deal to only play a team at home requires a payout of $500,000 (e.g., Southern Utah) to $1.5 million (e.g., BYU), Roedl anticipates that the most attractive mid-majors will command upwards of $2 million before long.
To ensure seven home games, Oregon schedules three out-of-conference games at Autzen in even-numbered years (when there are only four home conference games) and two in odd-numbered years (when there are five). Any potential Power Five school wedded to the same format is simply unavailable. Michigan, for example, will play virtually all its out-of-conference Power Five opponents at home in even-numbered years.
Therefore, another home and home series with the Wolverines is nearly impossible to arrange. Literally half of the schools playing nine conference games (i.e., Big Ten and Big 12) are on the same timetable as the Ducks, meaning that they are unable or unwilling to travel anywhere in even-numbered years.
So, then, what about the SEC and ACC who play only eight conference games? Well, it is true that their members have more out-of-conference flexibility and opportunity, but there are other constraints.
First, there are cross-conference traditional (often annual) rivalries that fill a potential Power Five slot. Examples are Florida-Florida State, Clemson-South Carolina, and Georgia-Georgia Tech.
Second, traveling across three time zones is truly an impediment. It’s more expensive, there is no alumni base, the State of Oregon is not a recruiting hotbed and Autzen is an easy place to lose. Roedl claims that the current UO coaches are quite willing to travel east, but this attitude is not often reciprocated.
Oregon is an attractive fan destination in September, and this certainly helps, as does the visibility of UO’s national brand. Yet many coaches from the Northeast and Southeast prefer to play closer to home. That the ACC and SEC share the same geographic footprint makes regional out-of-conference scheduling relatively easy and cost effective.
Enhancing Strength of Schedule
Now that I have described obstacles to schedule strength, what counter measures can be taken? A second Power Five game could be scheduled at a neutral site offering an ample payout. The athletic department embraces this option and has exercised it in 2019, but opportunities are few, especially if the luster of Oregon’s national brand tarnishes. Also, Group of Five (mid-majors) could be selected more on the basis of strength of schedule.
Teams like Cincinnati, Boise State and Toledo have been good forever. Sure, there’s no guarantee, but when was the last time San Jose State or Hawaii had a decent muiti-year run?
Next, it is possible that out-of-conference games versus skipped Pac-12 teams could be arranged when no high-profile Power Five opponent is available. This seems improbable, but it does occur in baseball. Finally, perhaps there is a way to make the dollars work substituting a second Power Five series every year for the annual FCS game. After all, USC, UCLA, Stanford and Cal rarely or never play an FCS school. Zero FCS opponents were found on the future schedules of nine Big Ten members.
Obviously, the Ducks are a long way from playoff contention at the moment. So, next year’s strength of schedule is largely irrelevant in that regard. But going forward, indeed up to a decade forward, strength of schedule could be crucial.
To illustrate, if Washington becomes a one-loss Pac-12 Champion this season, it is likely to be bypassed by the College Football Playoff committee owing to its horrible out-of-conference schedule (Rutgers, Montana, Fresno State) coupled with a relatively weak Pac-12. Other one-loss teams will surely be rated higher.
The Ducks are rolling the dice after the Ohio State series scheduled for 2020-2021. After that, the only Power Five teams on the menu so far are Texas Tech (2023-2024) and Baylor (2027-2028). Maybe they’ll be tough enough opponents to enhance strength of schedule. Maybe not. But at least Oregon fans will have a reason to visit Lubbock and Waco in late summer.
Top photo of Ohio Stadium from
A retired Psychologist recently relocated to Eugene, Mark Weinrott adopted the Ducks in 1974. He played soccer in college, coached soccer at South Eugene High School, served as a statistical consultant to four National Hockey League teams and officiated boys/men’s lacrosse for seven years. He is an avid Oregon football and basketball fan, season ticket holder and donor.
The Comments Below are CLOSED, as we are moving to the OUR BELOVED DUCKS Forum!
Comments below articles are now closed as we have moved all conversation over to the free Our Beloved Ducks Forum. It has been a big success already with many more posts than what we could fit into the comments below articles.
The Our Beloved Ducks Forum is where we we discuss the article above and many more topics, as it is so much easier in a message board format over there. At the free OBD forum we will be posting Oregon Sports article links, the daily Press Releases from the Athletic Department and the news coming out every day.
Be a part of the forum and stay caught up! When you wish to post there, do know that you are protected just as you were on FishDuck. Join us on the free forum right here!
Our 33 rules at the free OBD Forum can be summarized to this: 1) be polite and respectful, 2) keep it clean, and 3) no reference of any kind to politics. Easy-peasy!
OBD Forum members….we got your back. No Trolls Allowed!