Female Athletics: What’s Saucy for the Drake Should be Saucy for the Hen

Jayme Vasconcellos Editorials 109 Comments

Recently on this site, it was argued that, since women’s sports typically don’t produce much revenue, the coaches of these sports should have drastically reduced salary increases. The precipitating event, the departure of softball coach Mike White, centered around his claim that five Pac-12 Championships and five College World Series appearances — in just nine years! — merited a salary bump.

We don’t have to look far to find a comparison in men’s sports: Chip Kelly. Kelly didn’t win a championship, either. Would feathers have been ruffled if he’d requested a healthy bump? And what of Mark Helfrich’s $3 million salaries with guaranteed raises, and his contract’s consequent buyout of (better sit down) $11 million (this does not include the buyouts of his staff, of course, which were significant as well)? Then there’s Mike Bellotti and his annual $500,000 PERS payments. And don’t forget the more recent cash hemorrhaging to the likes of Brady Hoke, Willie Taggart and company.

From Twitter

Female superstars like Sabrina Ionescu don’t always get the fanfare of their male counterparts.

This difference between male and female athletics is especially remarkable when one considers Title IX. It mandates that financial assistance be “proportional to participation.” Incidentally, the law expressly forbids revenue production to be a factor in justifying inequality. If it didn’t, it would bear considering that 80 percent of college football programs regularly lose money.

It may shock some, but here it is: female students outnumber men, comprising 53.5 percent of undergraduates and 52.2 percent of graduate students. And this gap between women and men in college is increasing. Are women to be told that their sports are less valuable to administrators than men’s? “Sorry, but even though we’re a public educational institution, we don’t believe women truly are equal,” might be a hindrance when recruiting top female students in an increasingly competitive collegiate world.

But why are athletics part of higher education in the first place? Blame it on the Greeks; they believed that a healthy body leads to a healthy mind. I doubt that U of O President Michael Schill would enjoy explaining to students why female minds would be any less affected by the philosophy underlying sports than male intellects apparently are.

Kevin Cline

How should we feel about cheerleading?

And that brings us to another topic surrounding women’s participation in sports: cheerleading. There is simply no way to justify this except in the most sexist terms. Seriously guys, how would you like to be forced to sit through similar performances by men, watching them dance in tights? Imagine the bumping, the grinding … the whole thing.

You grossed out yet? Good. Now imagine how this appears to young women today. Or do we even care?

Jayme Vasconcellos
Eugene, Oregon                                                                                                                                                                                  Top Photo by Kevin Cline

 

Andrew Mueller, the FishDuck.com Volunteer Editor for this article, works in digital marketing in Chicago, Illinois.

 

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

THREE FishDuck Promises to Readers…

We will be the cleanest Oregon site with no ads or videos starting up to annoy you.

We will be the easiest Oregon site for mobile (Cell phone and Pad) users, as we want it fast for you.

We will be the safest Oregon site for everyone, as we monitor comments and assure that everyone is polite to all. (And we do want all your opinions!)

Simple, clean, safe and fast!